On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 7:02 PM, Xiaofan Chen <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 3:30 AM, Duane Ellis<[email protected]> > wrote: > > > All is not rosy and perfect, "WinUSB" would require an INF file that > > *points* to the driver - much like the work that Freddy is working > > towards with a universal libusb inf file > > Stephan Meyer (libusb-win32) user see WinUSB as the possible solution > for 64bit Windows as well. That is why he added the WinUSB backend > to libusb-win32 1.0 development branch. Unfortunately it is not working > yet. > The libusb-win32 WinUSB backend simplifies the use of WinUSB. I wouldn't agree with that. In terms of ease of use, libusb and WinUSB are about the same. I've just ported some code (which originally used propriatary drivers, then was ported to WinUSB) to libusb on linux and MAC. I didn't find libusb easier than WinUSB. Then libusb on linux has the problem with short packets on bulk reads which WinUSB doesn't have. Now if libusb provided device arrival/removal notifications for all OSs, that would make it easier on all three systems. Orin.
_______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
