On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Michael Bruck<[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 11:30, Øyvind Harboe<[email protected]> wrote: >> But why should we go for such an inferior and specif solution when a more >> general one is proposed and worked on? > > What are the speed/roundtrip time implications of passing all data > through the Windows socket interfaces for the TCP/IP solution?
Possibily neglible as OpenOCD is already highly geared towards long latency interfaces. It would have to be measured. > > The dll wrappers (there are obviously two approaches which DLL is to > be wrapped) seem to have the lower performance penalty. > > Michael > -- Øyvind Harboe Embedded software and hardware consulting services http://consulting.zylin.com _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
