On Tuesday 07 July 2009, Øyvind Harboe wrote: > OpenOCD has no way of expressing srst_pulls_trst per TAP > controller...
As I observed a while back, it has no way to express a whole bunch of observed-in-the-real-world constraints with different levels of resets. In that case, it seems more like the specific *target* has quirks. Not necessarily the TAP. And it may be something of a coincidence that this quirk resembles an existing quirk... > I believe that we should be a bit weary of overcomplicating > reset_config for problems that we have never observed, > don't have code for and can't test. Better to do the few > common problems that exists right and keeping the > definition of reset_config crisper. The *current* definition is as crisp as I think can be had given the weak reset models: there are four orthogonal controls. If you want to change one, just change it. _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
