On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 21:38 +0200, Øyvind Harboe wrote: > I'm trying to break down the patches from Magnus a bit.
As Magnus has now indicated that he does not intend to finish working on these patches, I know others will descend on them like piranha. I should have mentioned that developers need to be clear when they post patches that are being punted to the community, as such is certainly acceptable practice. His first message posting the patches did not indicate this intention clearly, but his latest post cleared the path for others to step up. That's clearly not going to be a problem. ;) These ideas should probably be incorporated into our guidelines for submitting patches, as it is very important to know who will be taking responsibility for fixing a patch that has been posted. We should not allow future complaints of either "I thought the maintainers were taking care of this patch" or "I should have been allowed to fix it". > This patch is a trivial re-factoring, but getting this committed should > reduce the rest of the patch to Cortex A8 specfic stuff. Magnus > felt that it was ready to commit. > > If we can have some smoke testing it should be alright to commit. > > Comments? It looks like David has dealt with my complaints. :) Committed. Cheers, Zach _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
