On Friday 17 July 2009, Spencer Oliver wrote: > > > I guess I'll have an update coming along in a while ... > > I have been thinking about the changes to the cortex reg's. > And do not see any benefit, we were already getting the info from reg20 but > just putting it in 4 virtual regs.
The original code is problematic in at least three ways: - Treats CM3-specific DCRDR selectors as architectural. (Patch at least *commented* this flaw, which won't really hurt till the next V7-M part comes along. The Cortex-M0 and M1 seem be V6-M.) - Hard-wired array sizes and indices. - Uses undocumented chip-internal hacks. (Which you say were once documented, then retracted by ARM for R1 parts, reasons unknown.) If what you say about the R1 docs is correct, then a partial reversion of this patch will be appropriate. I plan to look at this over the weekend. - Dave _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
