On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Spencer Oliver<[email protected]> wrote: > >> I got some pointers from Michael Bruck in email and was >> able to put together the attached patch w/single stepping >> support for arm11 hardware that does not support single >> stepping in hardware, e.g. i.MX31. >> >> Are there any downsides to always simulating the instruction >> to calculate next PC and using that as a breakpoint, as oposed >> to using the hardware single stepping capability? >> >> Objections? >> > > surely we would want to use the hardware single step if available -
Why? That creates an additional code path and is harder to test. > this is what we do for arm9. > Is there no way to detect the i.MX31 ? I don't know. -- Øyvind Harboe Embedded software and hardware consulting services http://www.zylin.com _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
