Dave, I graciously concede defeat to you on that point. There are far worst processors then the AT91SAM series for "control knobs" and the OMAP chips certainly follows that principle well! :)
I design with a broad spectrum of processors that run the gamut of very limited 8-bit PICs to high-performance 32 bit cores. So I guess my thinking used the PIC processor as the baseline for simple. Complexity is obviously a relative term depending on where your personal experience leads you to draw the reference line! Gary On 8/31/09 10:25 AM, "David Brownell" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Monday 31 August 2009, Gary Carlson wrote: >> The AT91SAM >> processors have many "knobs" that give the processor a great deal of utility >> but also provide ample opportunities to mess up things. > > You haven't compared them to OMAP chips have you then? I > always use the AT91 chips as examples of *simple* chips. :) > > For the record, the csb337 (at91rm9200) and its reset-init > event handler also does things like clock setup too. Maybe > some TCL library code can be developed, instead of needing > to grow more board or chp specific TCL code. > > - Dave _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
