David Brownell wrote: > On Monday 31 August 2009, Dirk Behme wrote: >> David Brownell wrote: >>> On Monday 31 August 2009, Dirk Behme wrote: >>>> +jtag_rclk >>>> + >>> needs digits .. >> Hmm, really? Then, jtag_rclk seems to be broken: > > I think you're right...
;) What's about applying a patch without digits until jtag_rclk is fixed? Dirk >> jtag_rclk: >> >> -- cut -- >> RCLK - adaptive >> >> ... >> Info : clock speed 6000 kHz >> -- cut -- >> >> jtag_rclk 3000: >> >> -- cut -- >> RCLK - adaptive >> ... >> Info : RCLK (adaptive clock speed) not supported - fallback to 3000 kHz >> -- cut -- >> >> It seems to me, this is not what we want. >> >> Best regards >> >> Dirk >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
