> Being able to change later to "one field of N bits" rather > than today's "M fields of ((N+31)/32) bits" will simplify > a bunch of code too ... but that can wait a bit.
Not at the cost of performance for the most common case: 32 bits or less. But I'll be able to comment more sensibly with a proposal on the table. -- Øyvind Harboe http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex JTAG debugger and flash programmer _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
