On Saturday 03 October 2009, John Rigby wrote: > You were right about the ir lengths, but I also had to put back in the code > that ignores non b01 for taps with 0 ids. The i.mx31 has the same weird tap > with no id and no b01 in the capture.
Hmm. I changed the diagnostics a bit in a recent patch, and that leaves it in a good position to just switch over to using the value and mask provided with TAP declaration. Doing it that way ... and the i.mx31 and i.mx25 could both just declare a capture value (or mask!) of zero and have it all work OK -- right? If so, could you work up a patch which does it that way? I suspect that could merge in time for the 0.3.x release, then. Thing is, we do have wierd hardware to cope with and so we evidently need to relax that test. But the original code was a hack since it relaxed it for *everything* instead of just for the minority of cases which really needed it. And on top of that, there was no comment explaining what class of wierdness was involved... - Dave _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
