Øyvind Harboe schrieb: > Can anyone come up with a reason why we should have the > "arm11 no_increment" option?
there should the possibility to do a memwrite without increment because you need it for nand flash (at least on Samsung processors) I don't know if this option is the right way to do this. > This seems simply to break memory writes. > > At best this should be a compile time option used only temporarily by > openocd developers for testing purposes. > > Does anyone know why this option is here? > > I suspect that in the mists of time when arm11 code was > being debugged for the first time, it served some purpose... this option came in later. I wrote a nand flash driver for the S3C6410 where this option was not available. I used the upper bits of the width parameter in the memwrite function to indicate the non-increment. _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
