On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 6:33 PM, Redirect "Slash" NIL <[email protected]> wrote:
> Aha, but the thing is, I am not distributing a test-signed device driver. In > my archive, I am actually providing *unsigned* drivers, along with the tools > & script for users to self-sign them, and I am requiring users to do their > own signing before installation. I see. I agree that this is a working solution for people who want to use libusb-win32 under Windows 7/Vista 64bit. > Now, I'm pretty sure I saw some talk about trying to get a good soul, with a > valid Microsoft Code Signing certificate, to sign an "official" version of > the libusb Windows drivers for 64 bit systems. This would avoid this whole > test-signing mess when installing OpenOCD w/ libfti on Windows, and the > scaring of regular users (or people who don't like the Test Mode). That > could probably also benefit other projects relying on LibUSB-Win32 (psplink > comes to my mind). > Not sure if somebody has agreed to do the signing though... This is the thread talking about the code signing for libusb-win32. So far no updates on this topic... http://www.nabble.com/Windows-2008-x64-to24807435.html -- Xiaofan http://mcuee.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
