On Friday 16 October 2009, Redirect "Slash" NIL wrote: > How about "MinGW-w64 portability patch for jim (embeddable Tcl interpreter)" > then?
I meant like something which might appear in any other legal document. Unless your legal name is really "Redirect Slash NIL"? > 2009/10/16 David Brownell <[email protected]> > > > On Friday 16 October 2009, you wrote: > > > Hi David, > > > > > > Looking further at the jim-eventloop issue, I found that jim.h already > > had > > > provisions for the modifier to use with jim_wide > > > > Good. Can you give a _real_ name for this patch? > > > > Pseudonyms are fine for general use, but in terms of patch > > and copyright attribution they don't quite have the same > > legal presence... > > > > - Dave > > > > > > > > > > #ifdef HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT > > > # if defined(_MSC_VER) || defined(__MSVCRT__) > > > # define JIM_WIDE_MODIFIER "I64d" > > > # else > > > # define JIM_WIDE_MODIFIER "lld" > > > # endif > > > #else > > > # define JIM_WIDE_MODIFIER "ld" > > > #endif > > > > > > It looks like everything was already in there to take care of the 32/64 > > bit > > > issue. > > > I'm therefore submitting a more satisfying patch that takes advantage of > > it, > > > by adding a __MINGW32__ check in jim.h as well > > > > > > NB: __MINGW32__ should work on both w32 and w64, as per > > > http://gmplib.org/list-archives/gmp-devel/2009-September/000963.html > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > >NIL: > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
