On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 10:02 PM, David Brownell <[email protected]> wrote: > On Friday 16 October 2009, Øyvind Harboe wrote: >> > I have a tree that removes those commits plus a few other bits >> > of noise that crept in. Thing is, pushing it would NOT be enough >> > to achieve the full cleanup. The existing clones would need some >> > cleanup/updating... >> >> Do you have a description of your changes? > > See the appended graft file ... note that we can't quite just > stuff this in the git repo on sourceforge. That will result > in broken "git log" output, though it does make the pulls be > gratifyingly small.
I'm not quite up to speed on this graft stuff(first I heard of it), but I trust you on how to execute this in the best manner. Tuesday is fine by me to switch over. So what will the normal user experience? Does he need to reclone? A new post & thread about your schedule would be great, so normal users know what to do, if anything. > # see http://git.or.cz/gitwiki/GraftPoint > # > # install in .git/info/grafts and see "git filter-branch" re how > # to quickly rebase without these commits. then clean garbage > # from the resulting tree. > > # ~100 MBytes of snapshots > 81ba80d742d8e422b9a3fdcbdf4713959e5852ad > 5c01a21b643348d1022b72274778b395638e981b So all the commits between, but not including, those two listed above are deleted. Sounds good to me. The rest of the commits looked like stuff from your work on setting up the mirror. I'll trust you -- Øyvind Harboe http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex JTAG debugger and flash programmer _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
