On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Luca Ottaviano <[email protected]> wrote: > Øyvind Harboe ha scritto: >> >> Does anyone feel very strongly about flash protection? >> >> My thinking is that OpenOCD erase should remove flash protection >> automatically. > > That's a good idea. > > Bear in mind, though, that some CPUs are bugged (eg. Atmel AT91SAM7) so you > can set protection bits only for roughly 100 times, IIRC. > So you should avoid this workflow: > - un-protect flash memory > - write > - protect again
So unlocking, if necessary upon erase/program would be the way to go? Locking would be manual. -- Øyvind Harboe http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex JTAG debugger and flash programmer _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
