On Wednesday 21 October 2009, Øyvind Harboe wrote: > > Notice how even the new "short" paths are in most cases longer > > than they need to be... > > The "short" paths should essentially make endstate + pathmove > unambiguous. > > So short should be "shortest".
They're not. I don't think that's a fix-for-0.3.x issue though. > Are there any shortest paths that are ambiguous? I don't understand what you mean by "ambiguous"; at any TCK edge, TMS will have only one value so only one state will be entered. _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
