On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Dean Glazeski <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Thought I would post a link to the discussion: > https://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/openocd-development/2009-October/011436.html > > // Dean Glazeski > > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Dean Glazeski <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I believe there was a recent update where Oyvind yanked out that command >> in favor of a flag on mww. I think it's something like mww phys address >> data or some such. I don't think he's gotten around to updating the config >> scripts and documentation, though. >> >> // Dean Glazeski >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Paul Thomas <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I just switched to the new git tree. First I noticed that the >>> "arm926ejs mww_phys 0xfffffd08 0xa5000501" command didn't work. When I >>> try and do a normal "mww 0xfffffd08 0xa5000501" command found in >>> at91sam9g20-ek I get back a "address translation failure" error. I >>> thought the point of the mww_phys was to bypass the MMU. >>> >>> Gary, >>> >>> Is the ek board working with the latest openocd? I'm have a custom >>> 9g20 board but it should be the same to that point. >>> >>> thanks, >>> Paul >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Openocd-development mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development >> >
Thanks! Yes, it's right in the help. "mww phys" has the same affect. _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
