On Monday 26 October 2009, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> A comment in evaluate_b_bl_blx_thumb() suggests that the Thumb2 decoder
> would be a simpler solution.  That might be true when single-stepping of
> Thumb2 code is implemented.  But for now this appears to be the simplest
> solution to fix Thumb1 support.

For now this is the *working* solution.  ;)

If you apply the Thumb2 decoder to valid Thumb1 code,
there is only one thing which should act differently:
handling of these 32-bit instructions.  That's because
that Thumb2 code punts to Thumb1 code for all of those
Thumb1 instructions.

Meaning that I'm not sure I agree about "simplest".

But that won't keep me from merging this patch.

- Dave

_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development

Reply via email to