On Tuesday 27 October 2009, Robin Callender wrote:
> Hi all, 
> 
> I have built and am testing the lastest version of openocd using
> a flyswatter connected to a beagleboard. 
> I have read this mail list for hints and reviewed all the directions
> on the beagleboard JTAG pages, but I am still not able to get a good
> JTAG connection.

I don't know what's up with that either, but what doesn't it start
acting fine as soon as you issue a command like "reset halt"?

The flakiness is caused by JTAG acting rudely when things start;
but later, it acts OK.  At least for me.  :)

- Dave


> My set up is identical to these shown in the flyswatter+beagleboard
> photos: e.g. EMU0 and EMU1 set as shown in the photo.  See the output
> from my openocd below.     
> Note that this is on freshly checked out source from the archive (today).
> 
> From the mail listings it seems that others have been able use this 
> combination.
> So, I guess I must have something wrong.
> Can someone give me a hint as to how to resolve this problem?
> 
> Thanks much,
> Robin 
> 
> 
> ====================
> ro...@ultraman:~/bin/openOCD$ sudo ./openocd -f interface/flyswatter.cfg -f 
> board/ti_beagleboard.cfg
> Open On-Chip Debugger 0.3.0-dev-00441-g993fe4a (2009-10-27-16:20)
> $URL$
> For bug reports, read
>  http://openocd.berlios.de/doc/doxygen/bugs.html
> RCLK - adaptive
> Warn : omap3530.dsp: huge IR length 38
> RCLK - adaptive
> trst_only separate trst_push_pull
> Info : device: 4 "2232C"
> Info : deviceID: 67330064
> Info : SerialNumber: FS000000 A
> Info : Description: Flyswatter A
> Info : RCLK (adaptive clock speed) not supported - fallback to 1000 kHz
> Error: JTAG scan chain interrogation failed: all ones
> Error: Check JTAG interface, timings, target power, etc.
> Error: JTAG scan chain interrogation failed: all ones
> Error: Check JTAG interface, timings, target power, etc.
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development

Reply via email to