On Wednesday 18 November 2009, Dean Glazeski wrote: > Hi all, > > Is there a good way for me to determine the erase block size for a NAND > chip? Right now, the device ID array in nand.c has 0 as the erase block > size for my NAND device. I believe this should be 128k. Is this not always > the case for 512MiB, 8-bit NAND devices? Is this just a case of no one has > filled in the table? I know my Samsung chip gives out additional data bytes > in addition to manufacturer and device ID that specify block and page > sizes. Can this be leveraged to dynamically populate the NAND devices?
I'm not following. Not that I've done this with very many NAND chips ... but "nand probe <bank#>" has so far been good at finding out block sizes. Including 1GiB parts filled out like the 512Mib ones... Are you saying that "nand probe" fails for your chip? Or just wondering if the table should be filled in differently? _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
