On Thursday 26 November 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 14:05 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> > Hi Andrey,
> > 
> > > Error: type 'xscale' is missing write_phys_memory
> > > Error: type 'xscale' is missing read_phys_memory
> > 
> > Ignore these errors. They are only reminders to the developers
> > to add this support to the xscale target.
> 
> I saw these two and think they need to be downgraded to Warning, Info,
> or even Debug messages.  They are most certainly _not_ errors.

Warning, like the comment says.

They're warning about potential errors later on ... in particular,
that "mww phys ... " and "mww ..." will be doing the same thing,
even though they are *supposed* to be doing something different.

In this case a minimal correct implementation of those two
methods would be to return ERROR_FAIL.  Obviously, something
that does the relevant hard work would be better.
_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development

Reply via email to