On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 01:07 -0800, David Brownell wrote: > On Tuesday 08 December 2009, Zach Welch wrote: > > As far as I'm concerned, you never need our sign-off for this file. :) > > > > --Z > > > > On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 09:39 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Øyvind Harboe <[email protected]> > > > --- > > > src/ecosboard.c | 4 ---- > > > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > That's true, you evil top-poster! ;)
For some reason, patches make me feel compelled... and it's hardly like I'm the only one, or that I do it all the time. :) > However... I'd really like to see this file get a > comment up front saying WTF it is. What hardware > uses it, etc. Yeah. Another reason to push for properly libraries: we could prohibit such oddities from entering the tree. That support should _always_ have been written as a separate application. Right now, the code has a serious case of multiple personality disorder. --Z _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
