On Friday 18 December 2009, Dean Glazeski wrote:
> Right now, I'm specifically calling get_nand_device_by_num or some such.
> Can you suggest a better method or direct me to an example NAND flash? I'm
> not really aware of any other method.
>
> > > +...@deffn Command {at91sam9 ale} num addr_line
> > > +Configure the address line used for latching addresses. The @var{num}
> > > +parameter is the value shown by @command{nand list}.
> > > +...@end deffn
> >
> > I suppose "num" is still necessary ... I don't know how the
> > new names are exposed. Are you sure that passing the name in
> > (which you might "just know") doesn't work too?
Maybe Zach can answer; he's the one who changed the syntax
to require adding a name.
_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
