On Sunday 20 December 2009, Catalin Patulea wrote: > I'm not sure what to do about usb_blaster_speed. Even if I were to use > sleeps, after passing through the USB stacks, FIFOs, etc, the timing > would be grossly inaccurate. It might still be worth implementing it > that way so people can run their interfaces very slowly (kHz range) > for deep-sleep debugging.
There seem to be some open issues with clocking in the various FTDI libraries. I know that when I tried to use those chips in a bitbang mode a while back, the bit rate didn't even vaguely match what the docs said it should be. _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
