On Friday 01 January 2010, Dean Glazeski wrote: > Yep, it's a memory leak. I suppose I was a bit hasty on posting it. Here's > a new version that also checks the success or failure of the alloc_printf > functions. I'm trying to think of a good way to determine if no matches are > found for the given match string. I'm not sure if anyone has a good idea > for that since the functions being used are part of a double function > recursion scheme.
This seems somewhat better. I merged it, with a few tweaks; if it needs more fix up, or even reversion for a better fix, so be it. > On another note, I was wondering if removing the error message from the > group type in helper/startup.tcl in ocd_bouncer is a reasonable idea. It > looks a heck of a lot better to not have all of that error output when some > one uses a group command without giving a subcommand. There are at least two problems I still see with the "help" logic: - "flash addddddddddr" complains not about no such subcommand, but about a craving for more arguments. - "help flash" doesn't display the "flash bank" command, just the "flash banks". Still, this seems like progress. - Dave _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
