On Sunday 03 January 2010, Øyvind Harboe wrote: > The biggest problem I see is that this is a lot of work that needs to be > done against a target family. Would be neat though!
All the more reason to focus on some standard format for such stuff, so that the chip definitions can be shared between Eclipse, OpenOCD, and potentially other tools. GDB already has an XML DTD for defining core registers. It would not be hard to extend that framework to know about memory-mapped peripheral registers. And ... doing that with XML would still enable the kind of embedded webserver processing you want. After all, the original impetus for XML was to enable better tools for dynamic HTML generation. :) - Dave _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
