On Monday 01 February 2010, Edgar Grimberg wrote: > On the other hand, for other drivers, shouldn't flash info do a protection > check on the background? Otherwise the information presented by the > flash info command is *wrong*.
So far as I can tell, it's only valid after "flash protect_check". What might make more sense is to have the 0.5 series dump that status only after "protect_check" ... like it only dumps erase status after "erase_check". _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
