On Thursday 11 February 2010, Edgar Grimberg wrote: > > I've been waiting for the regressions to get resolved before cutting > > another RC ... Spen fixed one (yay!), I got that ARM11 GDB thing, > > and you chased some STR7 issues; but that's about it. Regressions > > are supposed to be release blockers, regardless of other bug status. > > > > Ideally, an RC2 would be *VERY* short. This release cycle hasn't gone > > as quickly as I wanted, mostly because of unresolved regressions. > > Ideally, we should be dealing only with cosmetic fixes for RC2.
That is, after we cut RC2 we should be *really* picky about what merges. "Only cosmetic fixes" is one of the pickier policies; but as a rule, I'd say operationalb bugs can still be fixed (assuming they don't de-stabilize). > The fact > that RC1 took a bit longer is a good thing, now we have a stable version > and we can have 0.4.0 as reference. Longer RC1 means we can maybe have a bit more faith in its stability; it's not good in itself. When 0.4 ships, it will by definition be the current reference. ;) - Dave _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
