On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Bradey Honsinger <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 11:43 PM, Øyvind Harboe <[email protected]> > wrote: >> (This would break w/64 bit targets, but so would a million other things in >> OpenOCD....) > > Well, no reason to add another. You could change the > image.base_address type from long long to int64_t--I didn't notice any > C99 exact-width types before, but a quick grep shows a few other > int64_t uses.
But isn't that broken for addresses > 0x8000000000000000? -- Øyvind Harboe US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International +47 51 63 25 00 http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex JTAG debugger and flash programmer _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
