On Friday 26 March 2010, Daniel Bäder wrote:
> 
> > 
> > What version of Cygwin complains?
> > 
> > I did a test build with this patch reverted, and it worked just fine...
> 
> I think the cygwin version was 1.7.1 but I had this problem on serveral 
> earlier versions (SVN).
> I have now installed 1.7.2 and there the problem no longer exists,

Right .... old versions, old bugs.


> but I think it is good practice 
> to use the macros for uint32_t etc.

IMO it's better to avoid using printf with those explicitly-sized integers,
and not neeed the ugly printf string macros.

It's often easier to just pass "int" or "unsigned" not "uint32_t".

_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development

Reply via email to