freddie_cho...@op.pl wrote: > "gcembed" <gcem...@gmail.com> napisał(a): > > Hello, > > I have added a new command for stm32x : mass_erase_unlock > > This function combine "stm32x unlock 0" + reset to apply unlock + > > "stm32x mass_erase 0" > > Maybe "unlock_mass_erase" would be a better name? > That sounds like it unlocks the mass_erase function - that command name does not make clear that it *performs* a mass erase. How about "unlock_and_mass_erase"?
cu Michael _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
