On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Martin Zenzes <[email protected]> wrote: >> Just want to make it clear. Are you saying that libftdi-1.0 >> solved the following problem you have with FT2232? >> >> > Error: couldn't read enough bytes from FT2232 device (0 < 81) >> > Error: couldn't read from FT2232 >> > Error: couldn't read enough bytes from FT2232 device (79 < 81) >> > Error: couldn't read from FT2232 >> > Yes...
Great. This is one more reason for OpenOCD to move on to libftdi-1.0 (based on libusb-1.0) in the future once it is more mature. Once libusb-1.0 Windows backend is integrated in the main tree, it may also be advantages to move to libusb-1.0 for the rest of the codes which are still using libusb-0.1 (say J-Link, etc). -- Xiaofan http://mcuee.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
