--- On Wed, 8/4/10, Øyvind Harboe <[email protected]> wrote:

> I have never used it.

Not a fair reason to get rid of any command.


 Just like
> protection check, it can't base itself on
> cached information, so perhaps it is broken to the point
> where
> it should be removed rather than fixed?

If it uses broken caching, fix the damn caching.

(When I used it last week I got current status...
if there was caching, it was correct.)


Don't just give up and trash basic mechanisms that
let folk track/examine core flash status...



_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development

Reply via email to