On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Peter Stuge <[email protected]> wrote: > Xiaofan Chen wrote: >> The MinGW-w64 people are suggesting include_next trick. I need to >> check if that really works. >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg01913.html > > This does not seem right to me, I don't think it makes sense that > libusb-win32 (or any other project!) should adjust to the toolchain > like that. Strange suggestion.
I tried to convinced them but apparently failed. To be fair, they have a point as well. I wish libusb-0.1 and libusb-win32's header file were not called usb.h but rather something else. But that is the reality we can not change anytime soon. -- Xiaofan _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
