2010/10/29 <freddie_cho...@op.pl>: > "Xiaofan Chen" <xiaof...@gmail.com> napisał(a): > > Yet another solution is to have a generic cfg file with minimum > > 4KB of SRAM but allow user to overwrite the generic config > > file with bigger working area for better performance. > > > > Is this possible? > > Of course it is possible, but how many users will know that > they should do that (IMHO < 5%), how many users will do that > (IMHO < 1%) and how many would just complain in vaious places > that OpenOCD is slow and hard to use (IMHO > 90%)? >
I understand your concern. However, if you have a good wiki and documentations (say put in the comment in the starting of the config file), then it would not be too bad. Just ask the user to RTM/RTFM. ;-) A GUI utility to generate the config file would be nice. OpenOCD is anyway not that fast and indeed not that easy to use, compared to IAR/J-Link... -- Xiaofan _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
