Hi Michael, [email protected] wrote: > On 11/22/2010 07:10 PM, Jonathan dumaresq wrote: >> >>> Cannot see anthing wrong with that log - except it is probably slow. >>> >>> Cheers >>> Spen >> The problem seem to me that the remaining bytes should be zero at the >> end of the flashing ? > It should be, yes. > > However, I can't see the end in the log - did it stop there without > an error message, or did you abort because it was slow? I have no error. The openocd stop there, and I loose the control of it. Openocd stop responding.
> > I see the remaining count decreasing in 256-byte steps, which looks > normal. As soon as it reaches zero, it should terminate. > > The slow speed is normal in the case where no support code on the > target is available - we need to shift several 10-100 bits for each > bus cycle to the flash, and every word takes 3 bus cycles if the > flash has no pagemode, or 1 cycle + setup if pagemode is used. I see the 256 chunk decrease at a slow speed, but it's hang there. > > cu > Michael > Jonathan > _______________________________________________ > Openocd-development mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
