On Nov 30, 2010, at 1:04 PM, Piotr Esden-Tempski wrote:
> On Nov 30, 2010, at 12:03 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:
> 
>> On 01/12/2010, at 12:12 AM, Edgar Grimberg wrote:
>> 
>>> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Øyvind Harboe <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>>> 32 vs. 64 bit problem?
>>> 
>>> Wouldn't that be interesting? :)
>>> Are there Linux 64 users out there that can try it out?
>> 
>> I note that Domen Puncer is having a similar problem.
>> Also looks like 64 bit from the stack trace.
>> 
>> Piotr, can you try building 32 bit?
>> Something like:
>> 
>> ./configure ... CFLAGS="-arch i386 -O0 -g"
> 
> 
> Yes sir! I just tested the newest version in git of oocd with -m32 on Mac OS 
> X Snow leopard and it does NOT crash. So it is definitely a 64 bit problem 
> here.
> 
> Thanks for pointing that out!
> 
> I will try to find a 64bit linux machine and see if I get the same error 
> there. (maybe also someone else can take a stab at it?)

Ok I just tested on 64bit ubuntu linux machine. And "sadly" it works there. :( 
So the only way to trigger the segfault currently is running 64 bit openocd 
binary on Snow Leopard. :(

Cheers Esden

--
Blog: http://www.esden.net
Projects:
http://open-bldc.org
http://paparazziuav.org
http://github.org/esden/floss-jtag
http://github.org/esden/summon-arm-toolchain

Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development

Reply via email to