From: Spencer Oliver <[email protected]>

We only use the struct working_area member 'free' as a
true/false type so might as well use a bool data type.

Signed-off-by: Spencer Oliver <[email protected]>
---
 src/target/target.c |    4 ++--
 src/target/target.h |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/target/target.c b/src/target/target.c
index a9bb8e8..820e747 100644
--- a/src/target/target.c
+++ b/src/target/target.c
@@ -1213,7 +1213,7 @@ int target_alloc_working_area_try(struct target *target, 
uint32_t size, struct w
        }
 
        /* mark as used, and return the new (reused) area */
-       new_wa->free = 0;
+       new_wa->free = false;
        *area = new_wa;
 
        /* user pointer */
@@ -1247,7 +1247,7 @@ static int target_free_working_area_restore(struct target 
*target, struct workin
                        return retval;
        }
 
-       area->free = 1;
+       area->free = true;
 
        /* mark user pointer invalid */
        *area->user = NULL;
diff --git a/src/target/target.h b/src/target/target.h
index ef05e75..4d03018 100644
--- a/src/target/target.h
+++ b/src/target/target.h
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ struct working_area
 {
        uint32_t address;
        uint32_t size;
-       int free;
+       bool free;
        uint8_t *backup;
        struct working_area **user;
        struct working_area *next;
-- 
1.7.1
_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development

Reply via email to