On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Øyvind Harboe <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Michael Schwingen > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Am 04/27/2011 11:50 AM, schrieb Tomek CEDRO: > >> Hello :-) I think default-low-speed is safer choice for unaware users > >> or developers simply reading out idcode.. also it can be easily > >> changed into something more device specific to gain better > >> performance > >> :-) > > Hi, > > > > this brings us back to the question: what speed is low enough to work > > in all circumstances? > > I'm not looking for something that works in all circumstances. I just want it > to > be the *same* across all interfaces. > > The correct long term solution would be to have *no* default speed and just > put up an error message if the script doesn't specify it. > IMHO. > > > > So I think having no default and forcing the user to specify a value > > might be the way to go. > > Agreed. If we could have that patch first and not go the detour of a fixed > default across all interfaces, then that would be my choice too. > > Patch anyone? >
Hi, I created such a patch a while ago. See https://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/openocd-development/2010-December/017469.html Best regards Jonas Hörberg _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
