Am 06/06/2011 02:10 PM, schrieb Laurent Gauch: > Yes, this is to decouple the open and init (open the handle, init > the associated specific layout).
Is there case where open is used without init, or init without open? Otherwise, this is just unnecessarily complex. > (more smaller function ... as good OO coding !) > > The ft2232_init_sub(void) and ft2232_init() could be merged again in a > ft2232_open if needed > > But yes, we have all different point of view regarding what is open > what is init ... > > The objective is to have something like : > > open > init > deinit > close > > and not as the actual > init > quit open/close instead of init/quit is OK with me, but what is the advantage of the 4-function API instead of the old 2-function API? cu Michael _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
