Tomek CEDRO wrote: > >> If you switch output into Hi-Z the pull-up or pull-down resistor will > >> take care of the on the pin state. > > > > I think Michael's point is that *which* state it is is not known (and > > can not be known) by generic ft2232 code in OpenOCD. > > > > And that just because the code does not have information, it should > > not make guesses. > > How it cannot have this information? Who does then? When?
Well, it depends on what is between the FT2232 and the CPU, so information from both interface and target board is needed. It could certainly be added to OpenOCD, but I'm not sure if it is actually available yet? > The goal of OpenOCD is to interfere with target to obtain expected > results, after the job is done no interaction is necessary, or we > simply not quit the program to enforce some specific behavior... Yes, a good point. Michael, is the point to leave a known debug state driven, or just to leave with a known pin state? //Peter _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
