Hmmm. Works for me. Can you send me first few lines of git log in the jimtcl dir and also the output of make distcheck? And also jimtcl/Makefile
Cheers, Steve On 16/06/2011, at 6:33 PM, Spencer Oliver <s...@spen-soft.co.uk> wrote: > On 16 June 2011 05:38, Steve Bennett <ste...@workware.net.au> wrote: > On 16/06/2011, at 7:49 AM, Spencer Oliver wrote: > >> >> On Jun 15, 2011 10:30 PM, "Øyvind Harboe" <oyvind.har...@zylin.com> wrote: >> > >> > I think we should stick to distributing source packages only. >> > >> >> That's my plan >> - even that is not easy as Jim does not use autoconf etc. >> >> > > That sounds like an easy problem to fix. > Try the latest version of Jim. > I've added: > http://repo.or.cz/w/jimtcl.git/commit/142edb4e35a90c316564ec1aacf6dde9ec5861cb > > This should mean that 'make distcheck' works, but let me know if it doesn't. > > > Steve, > > I have just updated to latest jimtcl master in my local repo. > make distcheck still fails - this is because openocd expects jimtrcl to be in > its src dist archive. > This will not happen because jim does not create a distribution when make > dist is called. > > I personally want to release the openocd src and jimtcl src as one archive > that the use can just build. > This is always a problem when using submodules that doe not fully comply with > the automake stuff. > > The solution seems to be to get jim to create a src release when make dist in > called at top level. > Another option is to manually copy the jimtcl src into the openocd > distribution - but that is not very gnu and may put of packagers fir the > various linux distributions. > > Cheers > Spen
_______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development