Hmmm. Works for me. Can you send me first few lines of git log in the jimtcl 
dir and also the output of make distcheck? And also jimtcl/Makefile

Cheers,
Steve

On 16/06/2011, at 6:33 PM, Spencer Oliver <s...@spen-soft.co.uk> wrote:

> On 16 June 2011 05:38, Steve Bennett <ste...@workware.net.au> wrote:
> On 16/06/2011, at 7:49 AM, Spencer Oliver wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Jun 15, 2011 10:30 PM, "Øyvind Harboe" <oyvind.har...@zylin.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > I think we should stick to distributing source packages only.
>> >
>> 
>> That's my plan
>> - even that is not easy as Jim does not use autoconf etc.
>> 
>> 
> 
> That sounds like an easy problem to fix.
> Try the latest version of Jim.
> I've added: 
> http://repo.or.cz/w/jimtcl.git/commit/142edb4e35a90c316564ec1aacf6dde9ec5861cb
> 
> This should mean that 'make distcheck' works, but let me know if it doesn't.
> 
> 
> Steve,
> 
> I have just updated to latest jimtcl master in my local repo.
> make distcheck still fails - this is because openocd expects jimtrcl to be in 
> its src dist archive.
> This will not happen because jim does not create a distribution when make 
> dist is called.
> 
> I personally want to release the openocd src and jimtcl src as one archive 
> that the use can just build.
> This is always a problem when using submodules that doe not fully comply with 
> the automake stuff.
> 
> The solution seems to be to get jim to create a src release when make dist in 
> called at top level.
> Another option is to manually copy the jimtcl src into the openocd 
> distribution - but that is not very gnu and may put of packagers fir the 
> various linux distributions.
> 
> Cheers
> Spen 
_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development

Reply via email to