On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Tomek CEDRO <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Xiaofan Chen <[email protected]> wrote: >> Just FYI, urjtag works fine with either libftdi or libftdi-1.0, >> it also works with libusb-1.0. > > Yes I remember such discussion some time ago ended with good solution, > maybe worth copying.. although never tested is as I still use 0.1 in > BSD implementation :-) >
UrJtag can use libusb-1.0 API or libusb-0.1 API. Right now OpenOCD uses libusb-0.1 API. UrJtag can use either libftdi-1.0 or libftdi-0.1x. When using libftdi-1.0, it can make use of the async interface and speed up operation. I am not so sure if it uses the async capability of libusb-1.0. So for OpenOCD, it may take times to move to really use libusb-1.0 API and libftdi-1.0's async feature. And my request is not in this aspect, but rather to be able to configure with using libftdi-1.0. To do that, then it needs to detect libftdi-1.0 ( and as a result, need to detect libusb-1.0 as well). -- Xiaofan _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
