>> I'd think it would be a good idea to keep our own version scheme >> instead of using the one from asterisk. Why would our first version >> ever be 1.2? it sounds strange..... reminds me of IBM, never >> releasing x.0 versions of AIX, that is, 4.1 was the first 4.x.... > > there are mainly 2 different reasons of starting from 1.2 > > 1) pre0.2 was ready for production but never released as stable. That > was meant to be 1.0 > > 2) 1.2 is from where the * fork started, so we thought it was > convenient > to start from there.
I understand, but still disagree. OpenPBX has not yet been released, so IMHO it should be named 1.0 roy --- Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------- Those people who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do. (Isaac Asimov) _______________________________________________ Openpbx-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
