Max CtRiX wrote: > 2) that simple xml parser works quite well and i can use it in a simple > way (so i can focus on the real meat) > 3) i don't want to spend time to study external XML parsers and > validators and implementing it
Didn't somebody else (benjk? bkml?) want to use OSX-style plist configs? They provide the hierarchical nature of XML, without being so complex to validate and parse, and are also a heck of a lot more human readable. Don't get me wrong, I'm not anti-XML. I believe there is a time and a place for it. But I think unless you're going to link against a sturdy XML library like libxml2, the homemade XML parser is overkill - use a simpler config format, and a simpler parser. Plist. _______________________________________________ Openpbx-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
