Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> hi
>
> has anyone looked into this? http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4733.txt
> it seems nortel has worked out a better way to do dtmf than the old  
> rfc2833
>   
The DTMF in 4733 isn't really any different. Its all sorts of other 
stuff which had been changed or added between 2833 and 4733. A 2833 
implementation should be generally a sub-set of a 4733 one.

Steve

_______________________________________________
Openpbx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev

Reply via email to