Ken, I didn't argue in favour of using GNU PBX. Instead I suggested that proper procedure should be applied.
Ideally, the entire poll should be repeated without GNU PBX, because the introduction of an unscreened candidate (GNU PBX) has skewed the results. At the very least the run-off should be repeated with whatever are the top two contenders (*excluding* GNU PBX). rgds benjk On Mar 24, 2007, at 2:15 PM, Ken Rice wrote: > You know arguing about using GNU PBX is like arguing over if an rectal > sphincter stinks or not... > > The fact of the matter is YOU CAN NOT USE GNU PBX PERIOD... I don't > care how > many people voted for it... Its like if for some reason Arnold > Swarchenegger > got 70% of the Popular vote for US President he still cant be the US > President because he is not a natural born US Citizen. > > Picking GNU PBX doesn't change anything... You end up in the same > situation > of market confusion like you do with OpenPBX. _______________________________________________ Openpbx-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
