I don't know much about openpbx, I wish to find a white paper on how it relates or not to the Asterisk model. Do you have that information?
Federico -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ariel Monaco Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2005 9:41 PM To: OpenPBX.org Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Openpbx-users] T.38 Faxing Hey, what's happening to AGI? I have some ideas on how to improve it. Also the manager application. Ariel ----- Original Message ----- From: "Federico Alves" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'OpenPBX.org Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'" <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 7:10 PM Subject: Re: [Openpbx-users] T.38 Faxing > Please help me understand the Openpbx model. > > I am an Asterisk person, how different is it? I need AGI support, because > my > entire application resides in a Perl AGI script. > > Yours truly, > > Federico > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Underwood > Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 11:16 PM > To: OpenPBX.org Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: [Openpbx-users] T.38 Faxing > > Federico Alves wrote: > >> I need to know if the software supports or it will support T.38, >> because Asterisk does not, and without that it is very hard to >> actually compete with other service providers. >> >> Thanks in advance. > > Lets follow the industry standard here: Yes, we support T.38. > > Actually we don't right now. It is still in development. However I have > recently experienced many bits of VoIP kit that say T.38 on the box, > while having no T.38 functionality at all. Clearly claiming T.38 support > when you have none is the industry standard. :-) This is more than just > a whimsical comment. A lot of people think T.38 will be a magic cure for > FAX. It you look at > - the number of boxes which don't claim to support it; > - which do claim to support it, but don't; > - which support it, but in a very buggy way; > - which really work > you will find the last group is the smallest. > > Another issue is "what are you trying to do?". People vaguely say "do > you support T.38" when there are several ways in which it might be used. > Within openpbx there are basically three forms of T.38 support being > implemented. > - T.38 pass-through of UDPTL is nearly ready. Passthrough of SIP and > TPKT is in progress, but most boxes that do T.38 only support UDPTL > anyway. > - T.38 termination (which really means termination or origination) > to rxfax and txfax is in testing. T.38 termination to chan_fax will > probably be added at some point. > - T.38 gateway, between traditional telephony kit (PSTN lines, fax > machines plugged into FXS ports, etc) and the IP world, is in testing as > a standalone module. It still needs to be integrated into openpbx. > > Steve > > _______________________________________________ > Openpbx-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-users > > _______________________________________________ > Openpbx-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-users > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.4/175 - Release Date: 11/18/2005 > > _______________________________________________ Openpbx-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-users _______________________________________________ Openpbx-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-users
