Makes Sense - I think I will add this as a feature request to the tracker as this issue will most likely present itself in the furture when it comes to interopping with larger carriers.
-Chris On 2/6/07, Max CtRiX <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Christopher Aloi wrote: > Thanks for the update. > > Unfortunately that will not work in my scenario. > > Per the spec outlined in " > http://tools.ietf.org/wg/sipping/draft-ietf-sipping-realtimefax/draft-ietf-sipping-realtimefax-01.txt " > > A T38 negotiation should follow the inital flow I outlined above. > See 5.1.1 Sequence Diagram and 5.1.2 Message Details Starting a session with T38 only seems perfectly legal. It seems that your GW is not accepting that so it's not openpbx fault. MAX _______________________________________________ Openpbx-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-users
-- ------ Christopher T Aloi ------
_______________________________________________ Openpbx-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-users
