OpenPKG CVS Repository
http://cvs.openpkg.org/
____________________________________________________________________________
Server: cvs.openpkg.org Name: Thomas Lotterer
Root: /e/openpkg/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Module: openpkg-web Date: 15-Dec-2004 17:53:29
Branch: HEAD Handle: 2004121516532801
Added files:
openpkg-web/security OpenPKG-SA-2004.052-vim.txt
Modified files:
openpkg-web security.txt security.wml
Log:
SA-2004.052-vim; CAN-2004-1138
Summary:
Revision Changes Path
1.97 +1 -0 openpkg-web/security.txt
1.120 +1 -0 openpkg-web/security.wml
1.1 +78 -0 openpkg-web/security/OpenPKG-SA-2004.052-vim.txt
____________________________________________________________________________
patch -p0 <<'@@ .'
Index: openpkg-web/security.txt
============================================================================
$ cvs diff -u -r1.96 -r1.97 security.txt
--- openpkg-web/security.txt 29 Nov 2004 15:35:08 -0000 1.96
+++ openpkg-web/security.txt 15 Dec 2004 16:53:28 -0000 1.97
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+15-Dec-2004: Security Advisory: S<OpenPKG-SA-2004.052-vim>
29-Nov-2004: Security Advisory: S<OpenPKG-SA-2004.051-imapd>
31-Oct-2004: Security Advisory: S<OpenPKG-SA-2004.050-libxml>
30-Oct-2004: Security Advisory: S<OpenPKG-SA-2004.049-gd>
@@ .
patch -p0 <<'@@ .'
Index: openpkg-web/security.wml
============================================================================
$ cvs diff -u -r1.119 -r1.120 security.wml
--- openpkg-web/security.wml 29 Nov 2004 15:35:08 -0000 1.119
+++ openpkg-web/security.wml 15 Dec 2004 16:53:28 -0000 1.120
@@ -75,6 +75,7 @@
</define-tag>
<box bdwidth=1 bdcolor="#a5a095" bdspace=10 bgcolor="#e5e0d5">
<table cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0 border=0>
+ <sa 2004.052 vim>
<sa 2004.051 imapd>
<sa 2004.050 libxml>
<sa 2004.049 gd>
@@ .
patch -p0 <<'@@ .'
Index: openpkg-web/security/OpenPKG-SA-2004.052-vim.txt
============================================================================
$ cvs diff -u -r0 -r1.1 OpenPKG-SA-2004.052-vim.txt
--- /dev/null 2004-12-15 17:53:29 +0100
+++ OpenPKG-SA-2004.052-vim.txt 2004-12-15 17:53:29 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+
+
+
+________________________________________________________________________
+
+OpenPKG Security Advisory The OpenPKG Project
+http://www.openpkg.org/security.html http://www.openpkg.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+OpenPKG-SA-2004.052 15-Dec-2004
+________________________________________________________________________
+
+Package: vim
+Vulnerability: source arbitrary scripts
+OpenPKG Specific: no
+
+Affected Releases: Affected Packages: Corrected Packages:
+OpenPKG CURRENT <= vim-6.3.44-20041209 >= vim-6.3.45-20041210
+OpenPKG 2.2 <= vim-6.3.30-2.2.0 >= vim-6.3.30-2.2.1
+OpenPKG 2.1 <= vim-6.3.11-2.1.0 >= vim-6.3.11-2.1.1
+
+Affected Releases: Dependent Packages: none
+
+Description:
+ The Gentoo vim maintainer Ciaran McCreesh found several
+ modeline-related vulnerabilities in vim [1] and reported them to the
+ vendor. Bram Moolenaar created patch 6.3.045 that fixes the reported
+ vulnerabilities and adds more conservative modeline rights.
+
+ The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) project assigned the id
+ CAN-2004-1138 [2] to the problem.
+
+ Please check whether you are affected by running "<prefix>/bin/openpkg
+ rpm -q vim". If you have the "vim" package installed and its version
+ is affected (see above), we recommend that you immediately upgrade it
+ (see Solution) [3][4].
+
+Solution:
+ Select the updated source RPM appropriate for your OpenPKG release
+ [5][6], fetch it from the OpenPKG FTP service [7][8] or a mirror
+ location, verify its integrity [9], build a corresponding binary RPM
+ from it [3] and update your OpenPKG installation by applying the
+ binary RPM [4]. For the most recent release OpenPKG 2.2, perform the
+ following operations to permanently fix the security problem (for
+ other releases adjust accordingly).
+
+ $ ftp ftp.openpkg.org
+ ftp> bin
+ ftp> cd release/2.2/UPD
+ ftp> get vim-6.3.30-2.2.1.src.rpm
+ ftp> bye
+ $ <prefix>/bin/openpkg rpm -v --checksig vim-6.3.30-2.2.1.src.rpm
+ $ <prefix>/bin/openpkg rpm --rebuild vim-6.3.30-2.2.1.src.rpm
+ $ su -
+ # <prefix>/bin/openpkg rpm -Fvh <prefix>/RPM/PKG/vim-6.3.30-2.2.1.*.rpm
+
+ Additionally, we recommend that you rebuild and reinstall
+ all dependent packages (see above), if any, too [3][4].
+________________________________________________________________________
+
+References:
+ [1] http://www.vim.org/
+ [2] http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2004-1138
+ [3] http://www.openpkg.org/tutorial.html#regular-source
+ [4] http://www.openpkg.org/tutorial.html#regular-binary
+ [5] ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/2.2/UPD/vim-6.3.30-2.2.1.src.rpm
+ [6] ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/2.1/UPD/vim-6.3.30-2.2.1.src.rpm
+ [7] ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/2.2/UPD/
+ [8] ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/2.1/UPD/
+ [9] http://www.openpkg.org/security.html#signature
+________________________________________________________________________
+
+For security reasons, this advisory was digitally signed with the
+OpenPGP public key "OpenPKG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" (ID 63C4CB9F) of the
+OpenPKG project which you can retrieve from http://pgp.openpkg.org and
+hkp://pgp.openpkg.org. Follow the instructions on http://pgp.openpkg.org/
+for details on how to verify the integrity of this advisory.
+________________________________________________________________________
+
@@ .
______________________________________________________________________
The OpenPKG Project www.openpkg.org
CVS Repository Commit List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From jeff Wed Dec 15 16:50:47 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Wed Dec 15 08:50:47 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: archive@jab.org
Delivery-date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:50:47 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx86.postini.com ([64.18.0.74] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CecMQ-0008Cl-00
for <archive@jab.org>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:50:46 -0800
Received: from source ([66.35.250.220]) (using TLSv1) by
exprod5mx86.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:53:08 CST
Received: from sc8-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.7]
helo=projects.sourceforge.net)
by sc8-sf-spam2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
id 1CeL7N-0005iN-BQ; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 14:26:05 -0800
Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12]
helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net)
by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30)
id 1CeL7C-0005xn-Qd
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 14:25:54
-0800
Received: from colo-br-02.atl.jboss.com ([216.24.169.35])
by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.41)
id 1CeL7C-0005Ng-9Q
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 14:25:54
-0800
Received: from colo-br-02.atl.jboss.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by colo-br-02.atl.jboss.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
iBEMPrC5021761
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004
17:25:53 -0500
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -4.8 (----)
Subject: [JBoss-dev] [JCA on JBoss] - Re: TODO: ConnectionDefinitionDeployer -
replace XSLSubDeplo
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Unsubscribe:
<https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Id: JBoss.org development list <jboss-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe:
<https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive:
<http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=jboss-development>
X-Original-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:25:53 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:25:53 -0500 (EST)
X-pstn-levels: (S:38.17769/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.0000) gt3 gt2 GT1 r p m c
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
version=2.64
JIRA Task: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBJCA-2
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3858619#3858619
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3858619
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
JBoss-Development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
From jeff Wed Dec 15 16:50:52 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Wed Dec 15 08:50:52 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: archive@mail-archive.com
Delivery-date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:50:52 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx125.postini.com ([64.18.0.39] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CecMW-0008DM-00
for <archive@mail-archive.com>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:50:52 -0800
Received: from source ([217.76.128.98]) by exprod5mx125.postini.com
([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:53:32 PST
Received: from llla207-a.servidoresdns.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by llla207-a.servidoresdns.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
id B8044AF39A; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 17:53:30 +0100 (CET)
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from smtp-01.servidoresdns.net (llsa987-a01.servidoresdns.net
[217.76.146.208])
by llla207-a.servidoresdns.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24DF6AA71C
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Wed, 15 Dec 2004 17:53:27 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ns.digitalmediaconcepts.net (unknown [64.239.7.125])
by smtp-01.servidoresdns.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F60A1508D
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 17:12:05 +0100 (CET)
Received: (qmail 11293 invoked from network); 15 Dec 2004 15:41:31 -0000
Received: from static-129-44-58-159.ny325.east.verizon.net (HELO digital2)
(129.44.58.159)
by unusability.com with SMTP; 15 Dec 2004 15:41:31 -0000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Oscar Trelles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:12:03 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1b2
Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BASNativos=5D_?= Ordenando datos en el Datagrid
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b2
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Id: Lista dedicada a Actionscript <5dms.com.asnativos.5dms.com>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <http://list.5dms.com/mailman/listinfo/5dms.com.asnativos>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://list.5dms.com/mailman/listinfo/5dms.com.asnativos>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <http://list.5dms.com/mailman/private/5dms.com.asnativos>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-pstn-levels: (S:94.56223/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
version=2.64
Recuerdo que hace unos dias alguien envio una pregunta relacionada a =
ordenar datos numericos en un Datagrid.
Pues bien, Jen deHaan ha publicado en su blog un articulo que trata este =
tema y da una solucion (que no he comprobado) al problema:
http://www.markme.com/dehaan/archives/006560.cfm
Creo que mi solucion (a=F1adirle ceros delante a los numeros) es mas =
sencilla que la propuesta por Jen, pero digamos que la suya es mas =
"formal".
Ahi se las dejo.
Saludos,
Oscar
----
Oscar Trelles
www.oscartrelles.com
www.flashstreamworks.com
----------------------------------
Lista ASNativos:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.5dms.com/listas
----------------------------------
From jeff Wed Dec 15 16:50:46 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Wed Dec 15 08:50:46 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: archive@mail-archive.com
Delivery-date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:50:46 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx60.postini.com ([64.18.0.240] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CecMQ-0008Ch-00
for <archive@mail-archive.com>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:50:46 -0800
Received: from source ([201.245.164.130]) (using TLSv1) by
exprod5mx60.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:53:24 CST
Received: from afrodita.unicauca.edu.co (afrodita.unicauca.edu.co [127.0.0.1])
by afrodita.unicauca.edu.co (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id
iBFGrAl8004399;
Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:53:14 -0500
Received: from ns.hostinworld8.com (hostinworld8.com [66.227.36.185])
iBFGr1l7004319
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:53:03 -0500
Received: (qmail 9787 invoked from network); 15 Dec 2004 16:38:49 -0000
Received: from softdnserror (HELO hal-9000) (201.245.167.92)
by hostinworld8.com with SMTP; 15 Dec 2004 16:38:49 -0000
From: "Alejandro Rios P." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: avatar ltda.
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:44:30 -0500
X-Unicauca-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
Subject: [gluc] [Fwd: =?iso-8859-1?q?dise=F1o_gr=E1fico=5D?=
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Grupo GNU/Linux Universidad del Cauca <gluc.listas.unicauca.edu.co>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://listas.unicauca.edu.co/mailman/listinfo/gluc>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <http://listas.unicauca.edu.co/pipermail/gluc>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <http://listas.unicauca.edu.co/mailman/listinfo/gluc>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============91559459456979364=="
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Unicauca-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-pstn-levels: (S:21.73143/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
version=2.64
--===============91559459456979364==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-z65pnpVSZ0L1jwcZd0xV"
--=-z65pnpVSZ0L1jwcZd0xV
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-JCVdTB3KnlVgMt+ATY4o"
--=-JCVdTB3KnlVgMt+ATY4o
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
--=-JCVdTB3KnlVgMt+ATY4o
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Description: Reenviado mensaje - =?ISO-8859-1?Q?dise=F1o?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_gr=E1fico?=
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from atenea.unicauca.edu.co (atenea.unicauca.edu.co
[201.245.164.129] (may be forged)) by afrodita.unicauca.edu.co
(8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id iBFGLKcO030420;
Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:21:21 -0500
Received: from localhost (acuario.unicauca.edu.co [172.16.255.137]) by
atenea.unicauca.edu.co (8.12.8/8.12.8) with SMTP id iBFGLfx8004360 for
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:21:44 -0500
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:21:41 -0500
From: German Mauricio Mejia Ramirez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: dise駉 gr醘ico
X-Originating-Ip: [172.16.20.10]
X-Mailer: WMAIL V. 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
X-Unicauca-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
X-Unicauca-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more
information
X-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Srs Grupo Linux
Soy docente de dise=F1o gr=E1fico de la Universidad del Cauca, con mis comp=
a=F1esros estoy encargado de coordinar la infraestructura tecnol=F3gica del=
departamento y la facultad de artes, quisiera tener una charla con ustedes=
para ver alternativas de uso de software.
Podr=EDamos concretar una reuni=F3n para enero?
Gracias por su atenci=F3n
Mauricio Mej=EDa
--------------------------------------
MENSAJE ENVIADO CON WMAIL 1.01
UNIVERSIDAD DEL CAUCA
--=-JCVdTB3KnlVgMt+ATY4o--
--=-z65pnpVSZ0L1jwcZd0xV
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada
digitalmente
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBBwGnuoby7LzBs3/MRAurZAJ9oByoB33+m8Px/oiPXnVEMF52ohACgyNDO
Qc+BmvUNElLgtjmgBcYXv2k=
=AC2v
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-z65pnpVSZ0L1jwcZd0xV--
--===============91559459456979364==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
GLUC mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://listas.unicauca.edu.co/mailman/listinfo/gluc
--===============91559459456979364==--
From jeff Wed Dec 15 16:50:50 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Wed Dec 15 08:50:50 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: archive@jab.org
Delivery-date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:50:50 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx125.postini.com ([64.18.0.39] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CecMU-0008DC-00
for <archive@jab.org>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:50:50 -0800
Received: from source ([209.237.227.199]) by exprod5mx125.postini.com
([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:53:32 EST
Received: (qmail 82381 invoked by uid 500); 15 Dec 2004 16:53:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Id: "Slide Developers Mailing List" <slide-dev.jakarta.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Slide Developers Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 82367 invoked by uid 99); 15 Dec 2004 16:53:31 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
tests=RCVD_BY_IP,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of [EMAIL PROTECTED] designates
64.233.184.195 as permitted sender)
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (HELO wproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.184.195)
by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:52:12 -0800
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so231839wri
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:52:01 -0800
(PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references;
b=K71rLQuWFQDgc075hY7B9g7DWMdeckUKlYyPkD1jgdskbB1CZFCWNnhwrFnXwRm74fS2A424mYxVcOKRBtRenu1aWcKFP4kaw1MJ1ZI/zRClvU6NftMUuvZUWYeJMdpFXE9hN+QOYDLAOQRPxa30wCbAV7U52aE/EkkkucO0t7I=
Received: by 10.54.47.65 with SMTP id u65mr464166wru;
Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:52:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.54.11.53 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:52:01 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 17:52:01 +0100
From: Oliver Zeigermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Slide Developers Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-slide/src/share/org/apache/slide/macro
MacroPropertyUpdater.java
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Checked: Checked
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.0750) GT3 gt2 gt1 r p m c
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
version=2.64
Great new feature! Do you already have any alternative implementations for them?
Oliver
On 15 Dec 2004 16:26:52 -0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> masonjm 2004/12/15 08:26:52
>
> Modified: src/share/org/apache/slide/common
> NamespaceAccessTokenImpl.java
> src/share/org/apache/slide/macro MacroPropertyUpdater.java
> Added: src/share/org/apache/slide/util NamespaceConfigUtil.java
> Log:
> Enhancement to allow the classes used to implement Content, Structure,
> Lock, Macro and Search to be specified in the namespace configuration.
> This makes it easier to extend functionality in the core.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From jeff Wed Dec 15 16:50:59 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Wed Dec 15 08:50:59 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: archive@jab.org
Delivery-date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:50:59 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx52.postini.com ([64.18.0.219] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CecMc-0008Dc-00
for <archive@jab.org>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:50:59 -0800
Received: from source ([146.82.138.6]) by exprod5mx52.postini.com
([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Wed, 15 Dec 2004 09:53:40 MST
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by murphy.debian.org (Postfix) with QMQP
id C23982E8A2; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:53:28 -0600 (CST)
Old-Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from idmailgate2.unizh.ch (idmailgate2.unizh.ch [130.60.68.106])
by murphy.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 399172E339
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:53:26 -0600
(CST)
Received: from alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch ([130.60.169.112])
by idmailgate2.unizh.ch (8.12.10/8.12.10/Debian-2) with ESMTP id
iBFGrOIJ030824
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 17:53:24 +0100
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch)
by alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1CecBh-0000Nd-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 17:39:41 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Order of package removal
X-Attribution: fant
X-Ehrenamt: http://www.langau.de
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (
=?iso-8859-1?q?Adeodato_Sim=F3's_message_of?= "Wed, 15 Dec 2004 17:22:07
+0100")
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 17:39:41 +0100
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/)
X-Rc-Virus: 2004-10-30_01
X-Rc-Spam: 2004-08-29_01
Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailing-List: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archive/latest/21081
X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Id: <debian-mentors.lists.debian.org>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/>
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:53:28 -0600 (CST)
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.0150) gt3 GT2 gt1 r p m c
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10]
Resent-Bcc:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
version=2.64
Adeodato Sim=F3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know what the outcome of the "in which order are scripts
> called", but in any case why don't you (*):
>
> - have each of the font-packges that will need /var/lib/tetex on
> postrm ship a /var/lib/tetex/<package name>.emtpy file, so that
> "trouble" can never happen.
I can tell you why, but this would be a historical explanation - in fact
this is the best idea. Or rather each package gets its own subdirectory
within /var/lib/tetex.
Thank you, Frank
--=20
Frank K=FCster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Z=FCrich
Debian Developer
From jeff Wed Dec 15 16:51:03 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Wed Dec 15 08:51:03 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: archive@mail-archive.com
Delivery-date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:51:03 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx128.postini.com ([64.18.0.42] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CecMh-0008Du-00
for <archive@mail-archive.com>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:51:03 -0800
Received: from source ([204.153.247.10]) by exprod5mx128.postini.com
([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:53:44 PST
Received: from host10.octanews.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mapnp.mnforum.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 95F3B6C84A; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:53:43 -0600 (CST)
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from cenn.mc.mpls.visi.com (cenn.mc.mpls.visi.com [208.42.156.9])
by mapnp.mnforum.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DFAB6C820
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:53:42 -0600 (CST)
Received: from [192.168.0.100] (designit.dsl.visi.com [208.42.95.133])
by cenn.mc.mpls.visi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B096283EE
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:53:41 -0600 (CST)
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Sender: List [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Unverified)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:53:35 -0600
To: "St. Paul Issues Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: List Manager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
Subject: [StPaul] St. Paul Headhouse?
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
Precedence: list
List-Id: "St. Paul Issues Forum" <stpaul.mnforum.org>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
version=2.64
Anyone have any comments on this stage of the controversial Upper
Landing Development? This sounds like an interesting project - how do
the neighbors feel?
--------------------------------------------------
St. Paul headhouse: Dispute along the riverfront
Curt Brown, Star Tribune
http://www.startribune.com/stories/462/5137810.html
"It could be the unique finishing touch to St. Paul's massive effort
to convert polluted riverfront land into a vibrant blend of shops,
parks and housing along the Upper Landing.
But plans have snagged to turn an ugly-but-historic grain elevator
into a museum and restaurant dangling over the Mississippi River. A
seemingly minor dispute over who will pay for and own 50 parking
spaces has developers and city planners accusing each other of
reneging on agreements forged during four years of negotiations."
--------------------------------------------------
--
Tim Erickson
List Manager
St. Paul Issues Forum
http://www.e-democracy.org/stpaul/
Hamline Midway Resident
651-643-0722
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
St. Paul Links - http://www.e-democracy.org/stpaul/links.html
"The St. Paul Issues Forum is a interactive e-mail discussion on
important issues about St. Paul public policy. Participation is free
and open to anyone. We currently have about 350 concerned citizens
and community leaders subscribed to our discussion."
_____________________________________________
To Join: St. Paul Issues Forum Rules Discussion
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
____________________________________________
NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul
Archive Address:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/
From jeff Wed Dec 15 16:51:04 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Wed Dec 15 08:51:04 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: archive@jab.org
Delivery-date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:51:04 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx127.postini.com ([64.18.0.41] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CecMi-0008DY-00
for <archive@jab.org>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:51:04 -0800
Received: from source ([192.203.178.14]) by exprod5mx127.postini.com
([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:53:37 PST
Received: (qmail 26651 invoked by uid 566); 15 Dec 2004 16:43:13 -0000
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 26637 invoked from network); 15 Dec 2004 16:43:11 -0000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:46:52 -0800
From: Mitchell Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Mozilla Foundation
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Macintosh/20041206)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: For Approval: CDDL - license stewardship
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
version=2.64
Also, the license steward for the MPL is now the Mozilla Foundation, not
Netscape Communications Corp. This change was made as part of the
agreements relating to the Mozilla Foundation.
I don't want to derail Russ' points below, which are great topics for
discussion. I'll address getting the MPL changed to reflect this
separately.
Mitchell
Russell Nelson wrote:
>I want to start a new thread because I'm changing the subject. And
>yet it has to do with the CDDL approval process, hence the precise
>composition of the subject.
>
>The CDDL folks (Claire and Andrew) have raised a interesting point
>with their use of the term 'license steward'. Both the MPL and the
>CDDL each state that you may re-license under subsequent versions.
>The MPL names Netscape Communications Corporation as the author of new
>versions, and the CDDL names Sun Microsystems.
>
>So, why have we had so many re-submissions of the MPL? Because it's a
>good license that names Mozilla as a trademark you have no permission
>to use? Because it's a good license that names California Law and
>Santa Clara County as venue? Or because it's a good license that
>gives Netscape Communications Corporation permission to change the
>terms of the license?
>
>I want to be clear that I'm not judging the MPL based on my opinion of
>it. I'm judging it by the fact that so many people have felt they had
>to change specific names in it.
>
>And then the next question to ask is "Is Sun submitting the CDDL as a
>separate license rather than as a revision to the MPL because they
>want to be license stewards?" How should Netscape (and by implication
>the Mozilla Foundation and by implication Mitchell) feel about this?
>Does OSI want its powerhouse licenses to have outside stewards? Or do
>we want "the best" licenses to be given over to us to be stewards?
>
>I've read the diffs between MPL and CDDL. There is no change in
>intent. There's changes in wording, which Mitchell has expressed a
>concern about, just as any programmer would be concerned if somebody
>else has recoded a module of theirs, keeping the same API. "What was
>wrong with the old one?" "Did you introduce any bugs?"
>
>
>
From jeff Wed Dec 15 16:51:10 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Wed Dec 15 08:51:10 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: archive@mail-archive.com
Delivery-date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:51:10 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx31.postini.com ([64.18.0.186] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CecMo-0008Eb-00
for <archive@mail-archive.com>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:51:10 -0800
Received: from source ([193.110.243.12]) (using TLSv1) by
exprod5mx31.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:53:50 PST
Received: from atlas.connectinternetsolutions.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by atlas.connectinternetsolutions.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
iBFGPuD6024467
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 16:25:56 GMT
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by atlas.connectinternetsolutions.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id
iBFGPuEj024464
for prodig-outgoing; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 16:25:56 GMT
X-Authentication-Warning: atlas.connectinternetsolutions.com: majordom set
sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f
Received: from smarthost4.mail.uk.easynet.net (smarthost4.mail.uk.easynet.net
[212.135.6.14])
by atlas.connectinternetsolutions.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
iBFGPuSC024459
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 16:25:56 GMT
Received: from jgconsultancy3-2.dsl.easynet.co.uk ([217.204.173.170]
helo=[192.168.253.52])
by smarthost4.mail.uk.easynet.net with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
id 1CebyO-000519-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 16:25:56 +0000
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Tim Goffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [PRODIG] Epson 1160 lyson fotonic inks
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 16:25:13 +0100
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619)
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
version=2.64
Hello Prodiggers
I wonder if anyone could shine some light on this problem.
Epson 1160 lyson fotonic inks (cartridges)
Im trying to print images within a 2-3 inch border onto A3 photo rag
The printer is making a very neat printed yellow line about an inch
away from and the same length as the image.
Ive tried reorienting the image, flattening, cropping out everything
except the image
I made an A4 image with a single black diagonal line, as a test
and the mysterious yellow line is there but diagonally about an inch
away to the right, like a shadow!
not dirty rollers then...but what then?
I don't even know what sort of problem this is, hardware, software,
profile, cartridge or just time to retire the old boy
If anyone has heard of something similar before please let me know.
Im running out of ideas, and hair!
Tim Goffe
===============================================================
GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
From jeff Wed Dec 15 16:51:01 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Wed Dec 15 08:51:01 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: archive@jab.org
Delivery-date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:51:01 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx121.postini.com ([64.18.0.35] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CecMf-0008Dl-00
for <archive@jab.org>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:51:01 -0800
Received: from source ([216.92.131.4]) by exprod5mx121.postini.com
([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:53:43 PST
Received: (qmail 40848 invoked by uid 1010); 15 Dec 2004 16:51:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
list-post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 34507 invoked by uid 1010); 15 Dec 2004 16:50:52 -0000
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references;
b=fUie16Yzv16vhuIg9Mp2IofipTSdJWSwVOTUQQr9cV82DyZmev2/MGoQFCXVS1i8mI16JLensRpqLX/MzLUgtvapLj9lqxv9+xPFmIxkENNF2jU1RLuibSawsS2gs7a0oEX7/PVRrMsNOKpGTUzaVLAimJx2H1GndO5HURBvd2s=
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:49:03 -0600
From: Greg Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Greg Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: PHP General <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [PHP] Hostname
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.5022 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
version=2.64
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:28:16 -0600, Chris Boget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In earlier versions of PHP, you could use the $HOSTNAME
> global variable to get the server/machine name that is running
> Apache/PHP. However, that variable is no longer working
> and I can't seem to find a replacement in any of the super global
> variables. Is there one? How can you get the server/machine
> name?
$_SERVER['HOSTNAME']
--
Greg Donald
Zend Certified Engineer
http://gdconsultants.com/
http://destiney.com/
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
From jeff Wed Dec 15 16:51:05 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Wed Dec 15 08:51:05 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: archive@mail-archive.com
Delivery-date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:51:05 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx8.postini.com ([64.18.0.148] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CecMj-0008E3-00
for <archive@mail-archive.com>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:51:05 -0800
Received: from source ([64.213.108.35]) by exprod5mx8.postini.com
([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:53:45 PST
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by audifans.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A57234D3BC2;
Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:30:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: from audifans.com ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (gentoo [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP
id 01000-04-3; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:30:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: from gentoo.audifans.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by audifans.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24DC44CF718;
Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:29:59 -0500 (EST)
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by audifans.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 370B34CED1D;
Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:29:57 -0500 (EST)
Received: from audifans.com ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (gentoo [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP
id 01000-04; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:29:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net (rwcrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.198.39])
by audifans.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B9934C20E3;
Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:29:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [192.168.1.100]
(pcp05047031pcs.ivylnd01.pa.comcast.net[68.85.93.82])
by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP
id <2004121515295401500rv7a0e>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 15:29:55 +0000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:29:53 -0500
From: Igor Kessel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Fred Munro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gentoo
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], audi quattro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
audi s-cars list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [s-cars] RE: Valeo wipers
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The main Audifans list, for all things Audi" <quattro.audifans.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/quattro>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <http://www.audifans.com/pipermail/quattro>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/quattro>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gentoo
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
version=2.64
Fred Munro wrote:
> These wipers are available in Canadian Tire stores under the "Reflex"
> tradename. I just bought a pair for my UrS4 for C$19.99 each. They are made
> in the U.S.A and use the same ad artwork as the Valeo website, so I suspect
> they are the Valeo wipers - they are identical in appearance in any event.
> Haven't tried them out yet - they'll get a good winter test this year
> judging by the weather so far.
>
> Fred Munro
> '94 S4
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeff Pereira
> Sent: December 6, 2004 10:01 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: audi quattro; audi s-cars list
> Subject: Re: Valeo wipers
>
>
> If you go to:
>
> http://ultimatewiperblade.com/spec.php
>
> click on buy now
>
> and enter "secretdeal" in the discount code area they drop to $24.95 each.
Folks, this is nuts IMO. $25/ea for the OEM blades off my 2004 Allroad?
I buy PIAA Silicone for $17 each and am very happy with them.
--
Igor Kessel
two turbo quattros
_______________________________________________
quattro mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/quattro
From jeff Wed Dec 15 16:51:11 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Wed Dec 15 08:51:11 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: archive@mail-archive.com
Delivery-date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:51:11 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx125.postini.com ([64.18.0.39] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CecMp-0008Ek-00
for <archive@mail-archive.com>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:51:11 -0800
Received: from source ([193.110.243.12]) (using TLSv1) by
exprod5mx125.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:53:51 CST
Received: from atlas.connectinternetsolutions.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by atlas.connectinternetsolutions.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
iBFGUAtI025040
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 16:30:10 GMT
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by atlas.connectinternetsolutions.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id
iBFGUAdd025037
for prodig-outgoing; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 16:30:10 GMT
X-Authentication-Warning: atlas.connectinternetsolutions.com: majordom set
sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f
Received: from mra04.ex.eclipse.net.uk (mra04.ex.eclipse.net.uk
[212.104.129.139])
by atlas.connectinternetsolutions.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
iBFGU6Eg025022
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 16:30:10 GMT
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by mra04.ex.eclipse.net.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75F8413483D
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 16:29:52
+0000 (GMT)
Received: from mra04.ex.eclipse.net.uk ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (mra04.ex.eclipse.net.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with LMTP id 11066-01-43 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Wed, 15 Dec 2004 16:29:51 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [10.0.0.2] (unknown [81.168.44.174])
by mra04.ex.eclipse.net.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EE41134802
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 16:29:40
+0000 (GMT)
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 16:29:39 +0000
From: Paul Bradforth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [PRODIG] The quality of prints
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Priority: 3
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Mailer: Mailsmith 2.1.4 (Blindsider)
X-Virus-Scanned: by Eclipse VIRUSshield at eclipse.net.uk
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by
atlas.connectinternetsolutions.com id iBFGUAEg025034
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
version=2.64
On 15/12/04 Keith Cooper wrote:
>Read down the article and you'll see
>
>"... were less likely to fade than many High Street developers or even
>some professional wedding photographers"
>
>Remember that the BBC news website is one of the most visited in the
>world and clients read this sort of stuff too :-)
I saw that too, and also noticed that they said: "It recommended
avoiding so-called third-party inks not produced by printer makers
because they tended to produce prints that fade the quickest."
... so Lyson will be pretty chuffed about that, I guess. As well as the
other bona-fide producers of third-party ink. A little knowledge is a
REALLY dangerous thing.
--
Best wishes
Paul Bradforth
http://www.paulbradforth.com
===============================================================
GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
From jeff Wed Dec 15 16:51:08 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Wed Dec 15 08:51:08 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: archive@mail-archive.com
Delivery-date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:51:08 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx127.postini.com ([64.18.0.41] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CecMm-0008EJ-00
for <archive@mail-archive.com>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:51:08 -0800
Received: from source ([64.62.137.213]) by exprod5mx127.postini.com
([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Wed, 15 Dec 2004 09:53:50 MST
Received: (qmail 7205 invoked by uid 506); 15 Dec 2004 16:44:20 -0000
Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[] by dns1.techscape11.com
by uid 514 with powernet.co.id-antivirus-scanner (F-PROT: 3.12.
Clear:0. Processed in 6.190882 secs); 15 Dec 2004 16:44:20 -0000
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: bulk
Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 7132 invoked by uid 506); 15 Dec 2004 16:44:14 -0000
From: Mayzan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: PocoMail 3.2 (2000) - Licensed Version
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 23:53:35 +0700
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [GITARIS.COM] HARDWARE ngulik lagu
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
version=2.64
Hello,
Dimebag itu kan gitaris legendaris metal... dia gitarisnya Damageplan (ex-=
Pantera sih).. baru2 ini ditembak penontonnya di kepala.. langsung mati di=
tempat. Tragis sih.. lokasinya di Ohio.. ketika dia lagi show...
Pahlawan metal berkurang satu deh :(
Thanks
Mayzan
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 23:50:15 +0700, Sugeng Waluyo wrote:
>=A0......Maaf .....sekali lagi maaf .....ngomong-ngomong=A0=A0Dimebag
>=A0Darrell itu siapa ya ???? maaf saya gak pernah dan kenal mohon
>=A0dijelaskan ....
>=A0
>=A0
>=A0From: Sigit Prabowo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed
>=A012/15/2004 2:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Chandra Purnama Subject:
>=A0Re: [GITARIS.COM] HARDWARE ngulik lagu
>=A0
>=A0
>=A0Sebagai alternatif, ada Tascam CD-GT1. Ini semacam CD player
>=A0portable yang bisa buat music trainer. Karena punya feature bisa
>=A0memperlambat tempo tanpa mengubah pitch, atau sebaliknya juga bisa
>=A0mengubah pitch tanpa mengubah tempo. Juga ada phrase trainer untuk
>=A0me-loop bagian yang diincer. Plus sudah ada effects sederhana untuk
>=A0gitar dan vokal. Jadi praktis untuk latihan tinggal butuh alat tsb,
>=A0gitar, dan headphone.
>=A0
>=A0---sgt---
>=A0
>=A0btw kok ndak ada yg membahas meninggalnya Dimebag Darrell?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Ingin berhenti diskusi? e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Milis www.Gitaris.com didukung oleh Komunitas Gitar Indonesia.
Lihat ARSIP MILIS ini via web di: http://milis.gitaris.com
Brought to you by #1 DotCom Company: www.TechScape.co.id
From jeff Wed Dec 15 16:51:09 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Wed Dec 15 08:51:09 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: archive@jab.org
Delivery-date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:51:09 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx7.postini.com ([64.18.0.147] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CecMn-0008ES-00
for <archive@jab.org>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:51:09 -0800
Received: from source ([216.40.33.61]) by exprod5mx7.postini.com ([64.18.4.10])
with SMTP;
Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:53:50 CST
Received: from majordomo by www.opensrs.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1CedJK-0004t0-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 12:51:38 -0500
Received: from fr3.webmaillogin.com ([216.40.35.67]) by www.opensrs.org
with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CedJJ-0004su-00 for
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 12:51:37 -0500
Received: from [216.40.36.41] (HELO c1m8.emaildefenseservice.com) by
fr3.webmaillogin.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.7) with SMTP id
31464247 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:51:37 -0500
Received: from unknown [206.24.6.2] (EHLO westnet.com) by
c1m8.emaildefenseservice.com (mxl_mta-1.3.8-10p4) with ESMTP id
a9b60c14.3989.158.c1m8; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:51:38 -0500 (EST)
Received: from westnet.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by westnet.com
(8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iBFGpQ4f004701 for
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:51:26 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by westnet.com
(8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) with ESMTP id iBFGpQMC004698 for
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:51:26 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:51:25 -0500 (EST)
From: "Christopher X. Candreva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cleint Code and Billing functionality
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-MX-Spam: final=0.0294117647; heur=0.5000000000(-32200);
stat=0.0100000000; spamtraq-heur=0.7500000000(2004112601)
X-MX-MAIL-FROM: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-MX-SOURCE-IP: [206.24.6.2]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: bulk
X-pstn-levels: (S:82.32140/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.3536 C:99.7951 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
version=2.64
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004, James Ussher-Smith wrote:
> Why wouldn't you trust your business data in one of the most popular
> database engines in the world? Personally I'd be very happy to store my
For the same reason I don't trust my data to Windows, one of the most
popular OS's in the world, or Outlook, the most popular e-mail client in the
world.
But to make it a not-so-religous arguement -- for a Unix-only shop it means
setting up a Windows server.
==========================================================
Chris Candreva -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- (914) 967-7816
WestNet Internet Services of Westchester
http://www.westnet.com/
From jeff Wed Dec 15 16:51:21 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Wed Dec 15 08:51:21 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: archive@jab.org
Delivery-date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:51:21 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx15.postini.com ([64.18.0.155] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CecMy-0008F2-00
for <archive@jab.org>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:51:21 -0800
Received: from source ([213.244.186.176]) by exprod5mx15.postini.com
([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:54:00 PST
Received: from 163.com ([61.141.165.85])
by venus.starserver.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iBFGro5B041124
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 16:53:52 GMT
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "dsy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: =?GB2312?B?KrS/wPvI8yo=?=
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain;charset="GB2312"
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 00:54:38 +0800
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: FoxMail 3.11 Release [cn]
X-pstn-levels: (S: 1.32383/98.93130 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.9 required=4.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFCI_DSN,
RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100,RAZOR2_CHECK,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET
autolearn=no version=2.64
本公司进出口业务泛广，有多余《发票》可往外代开:
1（商品销售发票, 工业）
2（广告其它服务行业)
3(建筑安装业)
4(运输业发票)
5.海关代征增值税（进口），海关关税专用缴款书，
等业务。
如有意请联系王先生 谢谢合作！
手机：013798437292 传真：0755-89979055
